Biden’s Missile Move: Shifting U.S. Foreign Policy and Global Security Balance?

Man speaking with American flag background. — Democratic nominee for president Joe Biden gives a speech to workers after touring McGregor Industries in Dunmore, Pennsylvania on July 9, 2020.

As President Biden authorizes the use of long-range missiles in Ukraine, questions about global security and U.S. foreign policy surface.

At a Glance

Biden authorizes Ukraine to use long-range U.S. missiles for strikes inside Russia.
The move involves the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMs).
Russia strengthens ties with North Korea, deploying troops for support.
The decision raises concerns regarding future U.S. military support under a potential Trump presidency.

Biden’s Authorizes Missile Use

President Biden’s decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles marks a significant shift in U.S. involvement in the ongoing regional conflict. This authorization permits Ukrainian forces to strike deeper within Russia using U.S.-supplied arms. The development involves the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMs), which has been a point of contention among global leaders concerned about the intensification of the conflict.

The decision aligns with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s calls for deeper strikes, backed by Western supporters. However, President Biden previously opposed such measures to prevent escalating tensions with a nuclear-armed Russia.

President Joe Biden has for the first time authorized the use of U.S.-supplied long-range missiles by Ukraine to strike inside Russia, according to people familiar with the matter.

The decision is a major U.S. policy shift and comes as Biden is about to leave office and… pic.twitter.com/SiU6muDbVR

— Voice of America (@VOANews) November 17, 2024

Global Implications and Reactions

Russia has responded by strengthening its alliance with North Korea, sending troops to bolster its efforts. This development raises global concerns about potential retaliation from Russia and the stability of existing NATO commitments. The discussion of future U.S. military aid under a prospective Trump presidency adds to these uncertainties. The Trump administration’s foreign policy approach differs significantly from Biden’s, potentially affecting ongoing U.S. support.

Meetings among leaders of South Korea, Japan, and China have occurred, focusing on the increasing involvement of North Korean troops and its implications for regional stability.

U.S. Foreign Policy at a Crossroads

The decision to arm Ukraine reflects the Biden administration’s cautious but responsive stance toward supplying advanced weaponry. Since February 2022, the U.S. has provided Ukraine with over $56.2 billion in security assistance. The administration has been deliberate in timing these decisions, mindful of avoiding undue escalation. However, Russia’s significant drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure, causing fears of energy shortages, necessitate prompt and decisive action.

In light of these developments, the U.N. urges all parties to prioritize peace and avert further deterioration of the war. The current trajectory of U.S. foreign policy remains contingent on future leadership decisions, regional alliances, and Russia’s next moves.